Your profile reflects your reputation, it will build itself as you create new debates, write arguments and form new relationships.
Make it even more personal by adding your own picture and updating your basics.
Reward Points: | 6 |
Efficiency:
Efficiency is a measure of the effectiveness of your arguments. It is the number of up votes divided by the total number of votes you have (percentage of votes that are positive). Choose your words carefully so your efficiency score will remain high. | 85% |
Arguments: | 8 |
Debates: | 0 |
The example is from a 100 years ago. You can't compare that to the world now. Laws used to be very strict. If there was to be limits on freedom of speech it would to make sure people don't get hurt in any way. Giving ideas and your opinion unless it is hurtful should never get banned.
Closing statement:
Limiting freedom of speech reduces hurtful comments. Other racist and ethnic comments would also be avoided. This would create more equality and people would be more comfortable working together no matter who they are or where they are from. Getting the world connected in a positive way like this would help us improve and have a bright future.
When there are limits on freedom of speech it should only be for hurtful comments. People would still be able to spread information and advance both culturally and technologically. Getting rid of comments that offend certain groups of people make more equality. People will be more welcome to work together no matter where they are from. This ultimately leads to more advancements in all fields.
Fully free speech would allow for racist and ethnic comments that could be able to hurt big groups of people. If there are limits on freedom of speech people wouldn't be allowed for such comments. This would allow people not to get excluded leading to more equality and equal rights for everyone
unthoughtful comment like these even if they weren't meant to be hurtful could hurt someone emotionally. If there are limits on free speech people would be more aware about what is ok and what isn't ok to say. They would become more thoughtful of others while still being able to have normal conversations without worrying about hurting others in any way
Countries without full freedom of speech like the UAE have a well working government that is not corrupt. Having freedom of speech could also lead to individuals being brought down by others. On top of that a country with full freedom of speech is more likely to have revolts against a government while they could be more peaceful ways to approach a problem
Unnecessary comments like these even though they weren't meant to be hurtful for others could cause terrible things for other. In the moment at the situation the individual might not have thought about the consequences. Thats why we need limits on freedom of speech to make sure unthoughtful mistakes like these don't happen.
Giving people free speech allows them to make any comment without giving thought about other people. This could cause people to get hurt as seen in the Italian hall disaster. Someone shouted fire and 73 people were killed in a stampede on the way out.
I am probably a good person but I haven't taken the time to fill out my profile, so you'll never know! |