Hunter 8C

Data becomes hard to control once it has been created. Data can be leaked or hacked into which happens a lot to companies, so it can also happen to the government. In fact, it has happened before with the recent presidential election. Hillary Clinton's emails got leaked and hacked into and they were in the hands of the government because they have access to emails. They were not secured properly which lead to Russian hackers hacking into them.

https://nypost.com/tag/the-hillary-emails/

"Those organizations all map social graphs to see how people of interest relate to each other, and subsequently investigate their friends, followers, and others in their networks," Rainey Reitman, Activism Director at the EFF. Most of the time the government doesn't give valid reason for the reason they collect their information. As well as, the often do not get a court order. National security ought not be utilized as a convenient excuse to damage singular rights, in light of the fact that those rights characterize the country and make it. In the event that those rights are demolished, even with great expectations, you have viably ruined the country.

https://lifehacker.com/5904966/why-you-should-care-about-and-defend-your-privacy

Violation of privacy does not affect the "protection of civilians". Each time an administration expels privacy from its people, it ends up dictatorial. From Greece and Rome through to today. More regular people have passed away on account of their own governments, for the sake of "well being", than from the first issue those legislatures were implying to protect the citizens from.

https://www.britannica.com/topic/history-of-Europe/Greeks-Romans-and-barbarians

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” said Benjamin Franklin. It's not possible for a nation to keep terrible things from happening constantly, this is a reality that will never show signs of change, regardless of any laws set up for the sake of national security. The flexibility of the individual ought to dependably be secured, and surrendering it or minimizing it for a bureaucratic approach isn't practical. On the off chance that administrations need to advance national security, they should begin with a remote strategy. Trust that a country without singular rights is certainly not a free country, and all over is anything but a sheltered country in any case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/11/11/liberty-safety-and-benjamin-franklin/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.c2d8de7d7f5f

Opening Statement: Zaina & Emaan

Individual freedom is one of the rights upon which the United States of America was based. Our individual privacy should not be given up for the safety of the nation. To start off, even if this amendment is discarded it's not possible for a government and nation to keep terrible things from happening. Next, information could fall into the hands of the wrong people. Overall, our privacy should not be held in the government's hands.

ur just jelly because im right and ur wrong nananebooboo bfrgkuyffgallagsy

ya but like that means the dogs were dumb why would they eat cupcakes just lying around

i meant cheap lol my bad jhcabhj,ecaehcbchbjsavlyuadldfhvbhjbhfbhfd

can u stop pls that means ur not made of sugar and everyone has a little sugar in them youre all vegetables

VANILLA CUPCAKES R SO GOOD BRO I LUV THEM THEYRE SO YUMMY AND CREAM CHEESE FROSTING IS SO HEAVY